STOCK CONTROL
STOCK CONTROL
Stock levels are maintained in such a way
that there is no overstocking, so that chances of loss through damage,
deterioration in quality,
risk of obsolescence, etc. are avoided along with
unnecessary blocking of capital or paying interest on borrowed funds. At the
same time, there shall be no stock-out situation, leading to interruption of production and loss of sale and profit.
The production planning and control or material control department looks after
this aspect of stores-management by fixing maximum, minimum and ordering level
and reorder quantity for stock items i.e. standardised items of regular use.
Within these guidelines noted in each bin card/stock control card, the
storekeeper places requisitions with the purchase department for replenishment
of stock. But, how these levels are determined?
Reorder level
This is the level at which the Scorekeeper
initiates purchase requisition for fresh supplies of materials. Reorder level
takes into account the maximum consumption during lead time and unexpected delay in receiving
fresh supply. Lead time means time necessary
to obtain delivery of materials from date of order.
In case of unusual delay, stock should not reach zero level. Reorder level is,
therefore, calculated as maximum reorder period multiplied by maximum consumption.
Minimum level
This represents a level which the stock will
reach with fresh delivery of material provided the fresh delivery is made
within the reorder period and usage remains normal during the period. Stock is
normally not allowed to fall below this level. This is considered as buffer
stock for use in emergency. If however stock level falls below minimum level it
will be called Danger Level, when
emergency measure should be taken to replenish stock. Otherwise, there will be stock-out
situation, with consequential loss of production. Minimum level is, therefore, computed as reorder level less normal consumption during normal
reorder period.
Maximum level
This represents stock level above which stock
should not be allowed to rise. The main purpose of this level is to ensure that
capital is not blocked up unnecessarily in stores. The maximum stock level is
computed as reorder level plus reorder
quantity minus minimum consumption
during reorder period. This level is a control indicator and if the stock
exceeds this level, the consumption pattern and reorder period should be
reviewed. The maximum stock level is
fixed after considering the following factors
also:
i)
Storage facilities available.
ii)
Cost of maintaining stores including insurance cost.
iii)
Availability of funds.
iv)
Possibility of loss by deterioration, evaporation, etc.
and risk of obsolescence.
v)
Possibility of price fluctuation. For
instance, in case of seasonal materials, price may be low in season and high in
off-season.
vi)
Government restriction on import or procurement.
vii)
Economic order quantity.
It is important to note that setting of stock
levels requires correct projection of usage pattern, lead-time and estimate of
reordering quantity, stock-levels, therefore, cannot be established where:
(a)
rate of consumption is erratic,
(b) material is
not in common use,
(c)
market of the particular material is uncertain
Stock Turnover and
Average Stock–holding
Stock turnover ratio
indicates how many times
stock is rotated, on
an average, during a
particular period, say a year. This is calculated for different groups of
materials separately in the following way:
Stock turnover ratio = cost of materials used
during the period divided by average stock of materials held during the period.
Average stock holding is obtained by –
(a)
Averaging opening and closing stocks,
(b)
Averaging maximum and minimum levels of stock, or
(c)
Minimum stock plus half
of reorder quantity.
Reorder Quantity
This refers to the quantity to be covered in
a single purchase order. While deciding the reorder quantity, the following
factors are considered:
(a)
Consumption pattern of the material.
(b) Nature of the
material i.e. risk of deterioration, evaporation, etc.
(c)
Risk of price-fluctuation.
(d) Seasonal
consideration as to the price and availability of supplies.
(e)
Storage space availability.
(f) Quantum of discount.
(g) Carrying cost
and ordering cost.
Carrying Cost and Ordering
Cost
Cost of carrying stock includes rent,
insurance and other cost of storage, interest on capital blocked, losses and
pilferage, risk of obsolescence, etc. Cost of ordering consists of the
cost of placing an order, setting up of
production-run, transportation and receiving cost. Carrying costs are mostly
variable, while ordering costs are mostly fixed and partly variable with the
number of orders. Carrying cost increases with the increase in reorder
quantity, while ordering cost decreases with the increase in number of orders.
Thus, carrying cost and ordering cost move in opposite direction.
Economic Order Quantity (EOQ)
The concept of Economic Order Quantity or EOQ
has emerged out of this behaviour of carrying cost and ordering cost. EOQ is
the quantity fixed at a point where total cost of ordering and the cost of
carrying the inventory will be the minimum. EOQ may be arrived at by tabular
method by preparing purchase order tables, showing the ordering cost, carrying
cost and total cost of various sizes of purchase orders, or can be established
by algebraic equation or by graph.
Let us take an illustration:
Material: Airtight box Code
No.: P 3002 Monthly usage :250 pcs.
Cost
of placing and receiving one order Rs. 60. Cost of materials per unit Rs. 10
Carrying cost = 10% of inventory value. Find out EOQ by i) tabular method, & ii) eqn. method.
Solution :
= = = 600 units
The above formula can be
developed in the following way :
Let
|
E
|
=
|
EOQ
|
|
RU
|
=
|
Annual
requirement units
|
|
CO
|
=
|
Cost per
order
|
|
CU
|
=
|
Cost per
unit of material
|
Now,
|
CC
|
=
|
Carrying
cost
|
Total number
of orders to be placed =RU
÷ E
Total cost of placing the order in a
year = RU * CO ÷ E
EOQ
model is based on the following assumptions
:
(i)
Material cost per unit remains unaffected by order size.
(ii)
Orders will be received on the expiry of lead time.
(iii)
Variable inventory
carrying cost per unit and ordering cost per order remain constant throughout
the order.
(iv) Production and
sales can be forecast perfectly.
PRICING ISSUES OF MATERIAL
Materials issued from stores should be valued
at the rate they are carried in stock. Materials are valued at cost and entry
in the stores ledger is made with every receipt. Different lot of materials may
be received at different prices. Hence, when issues are made from stock, it may
happen that materials from more than one lot may have to be issued. Which price
will be applicable in such case? Actual cost or average price, market price or
notional price? Various methods for pricing materials issued from stores are
classified in the following manner:
A. Cost price methods :
i)
Specific price
ii)
First in, first out (FIFO)
iii)
Last in, first out (LIFO)
iv)
Highest in, first out
(HIFO)
v)
Base stock price.
B. Average price methods:
i)
Simple average
ii)
Weighted average
iii)
Periodic simple average
iv)
Periodic weighted average
v)
Moving simple average
vi)
Moving weighted average
C. Current price methods :
i)
Replacement price
ii)
Next in, first out (NIFO)
D. Notional price methods :
i)
Standard price
ii)
Inflated price
iii)
Re-use price
A.(I) Specific Price Method
Specific price method is applicable to materials purchased for a particular job, order or process,
and are identified when received either in stores or in the shop floor
directly. Such materials are usually nonstandard and the actual
cost is charged
to the job or order or process
concerned. No question of difference arises out of such pricing.
A.(II) First In, First Out (FIFO)
This method assumes that materials are used
in the order in which they are received in stores. Hence, the price of the
first lot is charged to all issues till the stock lasts. In other words, the
issues are priced in the chronological order of receipts. As a result, closing
stock will be valued at latest purchase
price.
To illustrate, let us take an example. A
manufacturing company has recorded the following transactions of material A-320
oil, during the month of September,
2001.
|
Quantity
|
Unit
|
Rate (Rs.)
|
||
2001 Sept.
|
1
|
— Opening Stock
|
300
|
Litre
|
9.70
|
|
5
|
— Purchase
|
250
|
”
|
9.80
|
|
9
|
— Issues
|
400
|
”
|
|
|
14
|
— Purchases
|
300
|
”
|
10.00
|
|
16
|
— Issues
|
200
|
”
|
|
|
25
|
— Purchase
|
150
|
”
|
10.50
|
|
26
|
— Issues
|
150
|
”
|
|
The consumption value of the material and closing stock
as on 30.9.01 will be as follows under FIFO method :
Stores Ledger (FIFO Method)
Material :
Code No. :
|
A 320 oil
|
|
|
|
|
|
A/c :
Unit :
|
Raw materia
Litre
|
l
|
||
|
Receipt
|
|
|
Issue
|
|
|
|
Balance
|
|
||
Date SRN.
|
Qty. Rate
|
Amt.
|
MRN.
|
Qty.
|
Rate
|
Amt.
|
Qty.
|
Rate
|
Amt.
|
||
No.
|
Rs.
|
Rs.
|
No.
|
|
Rs.
|
Rs.
|
|
Rs.
|
Rs.
|
||
2001
Sept. 1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
300
|
9.70
|
2910
|
5
|
xx
|
250
|
9.80
|
2450
|
|
|
|
|
550*
|
|
5360
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
xx
|
300
|
9.70
|
2910
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100
|
9.80
|
980
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
400
|
|
3890
|
150
|
|
1470
|
14
|
xx
|
300
|
10.00
|
3000
|
|
|
|
|
450
|
|
4470
|
16
|
|
|
|
|
xx
|
150
|
9.80
|
1470
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50
|
10.00
|
500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
200
|
|
1970
|
250
|
|
2500
|
25
|
xx
|
150
|
10.50
|
1575
|
|
|
|
|
400
|
|
4075
|
26
|
|
|
|
|
xx
|
150
|
10.00
|
1500
|
250
|
|
1575
|
|
|
|
|
7025
|
|
|
|
7360
|
|
|
|
|
The consumption and closing
stocks values are as follows :
Opening stock
|
Rs.
2910
|
|
Add
: Receipts
|
Rs. 7025
|
(2450 + 3000
+ 1575)
|
Less
: Consumption
|
Rs. 7360
|
(3890 + 1970
+ 1500)
|
Closing stock
|
Rs. 2575
|
|
* Alternatively, the stocks can be shown chronologically as
300,250 separately in the balance column and FIFO or LIFO method can be
followed.
Advantages :
a)
Simple method to understand and operate.
b)
Material cost represents actual cost
which should be charged to product or process. c) Stock value is closer to current price.
Disadvantages:
a)
In fluctuating price and too many
purchases and issues, this method will involve more calculations.
b)
It overstates profit at the time of rising prices.
c)
If price changes frequently, comparison
of one job with the other will not serve useful purpose. Similar jobs will have
different costs because of price change.
d)
Adjustment for rejection and returns become complicated.
A.(III) Last In, First Out (LIFO)
This method assumes that the last receipt of
stock is issued first. The method has advantage under inflationary condition of
the market. Using the same data of the earlier illustration, the issue prices
and closing stock valuation of the material will be as follows :
Stores Ledger (LIFO Method)
Material :
Code No. :
|
A 320 oil
|
|
|
|
|
|
A/c :
Unit :
|
Raw material
Litre
|
|||
Date SRN.
|
Receipt
Qty. Rate
|
Amt.
|
MRN.
|
Issue Qty.
|
Rate
|
Amt.
|
Qty.
|
Balance
Rate Amt.
|
|||
No.
|
Rs.
|
Rs.
|
No.
|
|
Rs.
|
Rs.
|
|
Rs. Rs.
|
|||
2001
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sept. 1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
300
|
9.70
|
2910
|
5
|
xx
|
250
|
9.80
|
2450
|
|
|
|
|
550*
|
|
5360
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
xx
|
250
|
9.80
|
2450
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
150
|
9.70
|
1455
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
400
|
|
3905
|
150
|
|
1455
|
14
|
xx
|
300
|
10.00
|
3000
|
|
|
|
|
450
|
|
4455
|
16
|
|
|
|
|
xx
|
200
|
10.00
|
2000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
250
|
|
2455
|
25
|
xx
|
150
|
10.50
|
1575
|
|
|
|
|
400
|
|
4030
|
26
|
|
|
|
|
xx
|
150
|
10.50
|
1575
|
250
|
|
2455
|
|
|
|
|
7025
|
|
|
|
7480
|
|
|
|
* Breakdown
of closing stock 150
|
@
|
9.70
|
1455
|
|
100
|
@
|
10.00
|
1000
|
|
250
|
|
|
2455
|
|
The consumption and closing stock
values are as follows :
|
||||
Opening stock
Add : Total receipts
|
Rs. 2910
Rs. 7025
|
(2450 + 3000 + 1575)
|
||
Less : Total consumption
|
Rs. 7480
|
(3905 + 2000 + 1575)
|
||
Closing stock
|
Rs. 2455
|
|
||
Advantages:
|
|
|
||
a) Issues are
charged at current price, which is more
appropriate.
b) Profit is realistic.
Disadvantages:
a) Stock-value
does not represent current market price.
b)
Unfair comparison of job cost when price changes too frequently.
c)
Like FIFO, this method also involves too
many calculations, if frequent price changes occur and purchases are made in
small lots.
However, the method is useful for materials used, less frequently and under inflationary condition.
A.(IV) Highest In, First Out (HIFO)
Under this method, issues are valued at the
highest price i.e. costliest items are issued first, and inventory is kept at lowest
possible price. Thus,
a secret reserve
is created by undervaluing
stock. This method is complicated to administer, if there are numerous
purchases within short period.
In the previous, illustration, if last
purchase on 25th September costs @ Rs.10.50 per unit, then the consumption and stock value will be
Rs.7480 and Rs.2455 as receipts will be valued at Rs.7025. (Try yourself following previous solution). HIFO method is
mainly used by monopoly products or
cost-plus contracts.
Comments
Post a Comment